The Problem is not Uber, the Problem is missing Regulation2014-04-23 0
Uber, the limousine service based out of San Francisco, has been quite the topic this past week – especially since a local Berlin Taxi Operator has asked a Berlin court for a preliminary injunction regarding Uber Black in Berlin. Interesting is that the taxi operator who asked for the injunction has decided not to proceed with it. If this preliminary injunction is overturned, the taxi operator could be required to pay compensation claims to Uber.
Though there is quite a discussion around if Uber will be successful in Germany or not, that is not the issue.The issue is the court ruling. It underlines the obvious: Germany is not flexible at all when it comes to new businesses.
While you could argue that operators partnering with the Uber platform could be in violation of the law if they do not return their limousines to their operational headquarter, also notice the fact that this law was passed in 1961, last changes were made in 1990.
That was shorty after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and almost 20 years (!) before the first iPhone was presented in 2007. It was a time far away from the age of smartphones, apps, location-based services and the opportunities and variety we have today.
Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commision, commented on Brussel’s court decision on banning Uber on her blog: “This decision is not about protecting or helping passengers – it’s about protecting a taxi cartel. The relevant Brussels Regional Minister is Brigitte Grouwels. Her title is ‘Mobility Minister’. Maybe it should be ‘anti-Mobility Minister’. She is even proud of the fact that she is stopping this innovation. It isn’t protecting jobs Madame, it is just annoying people!”
This is not just an Uber problem. It’s a problem we face with every “innovation”. Even the ones where you can order a car that is not a taxi with your smartphone. Airbnb faces the same issue. Vacation rentals are not new but, of course, the hotel cartel fears them.
In the case of Airbnb, the issue is even more complex. E.g. property costs are rising and families feel that they are being treated unfairly when individuals take advantage of personal extra space such as when someone rents out four rooms in a five room apartment for a profit.
This is another example of why it is so important to develop new regulations. The truth is new businesses affect us, directly or indirectly.
In the end, Germany is great when it comes to cars, Schwarzbrot and beer. However, it needs to recognize that there are industries, ideas, and companies that come up and will change how we live, behave and how we spend our money. It’s time for German companies to stop blocking innovation and accepting the outdated laws.
It’s not just Uber and Airbnb who should support this argument. It’s also old industries that should re-think their business models.
Politicians need to come closer to both sides to understand the complexity of disruptive business models and ideas and help find a way that supports all parties. After all, it’s not just about businesses but also about markets and customers that demand new ways to perform old habits.
Image Source: Felicitas Hackmann
Update: The first edition of this post referred to a different link, which has now been corrected, as well as the facts that is was referring to.
All images in this article are subject to the Creative-Commons-Lizenz (credit - no editing, CC BY-ND , link to the legally-binding license agreement). Excluded are pictures that are labelled differently, including from Panthermedia, Fotolia, Pixelio, Morguefile, along with press photos or publishers' own visual material.